The paper on tree-forest ratios is here https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10999. While writing this, I needed some reasonable upper bound estimates for the k-th eigenvalue. This is written down separately https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10968. The second paper proves an surprisingly simple but apparently new inequality if are the eigenvalues of the Kirchhoff Laplacian of a finite simple graph and where are the vertex degrees of the graph. If you should be in graph spectral research and have seen the inequality, let me know. I might actually make an exception in this case and bother trying to submit this to a journal, hoping for the rare luck that the paper would be looked at by an expert. There is no rush with that. This might take years. The easiest verification of course would be somebody plagiarizing the result. This is the most effective peer review !!! I mentioned in the video below that the proof of the bound could be given as an exercise as it just needs the information that it is true and that it has a simple proof. There are different ways to see the result. I myself had a scare for some time suddenly thinking that the catchy corollary (which is the version shown in the video) is just a consequence of the Gershgorin circle theorem. But Gershgorin’s theorem does not say much in the Kirchhoff case, where the Gershgorin circles are nested.
The main result on trees and forests is that in the Barycentric limit, the exponential growth rate of the number of rooted spanning trees as well as the exponential growth rate of the number of rooted spanning forests exists. We see these values as potential values U(0) or U(-1) of a potential function U. This subharmonic function has the universal density of states as Riesz measure. We understand the one-dimensional case very well as then the tree growth-rate (U(0)=0) and the forest growth rate U(-1)=2 log(golden ratio) are known and the Riesz measure is the equilibrium measure on [0,4] and is also known as the arc-sin distribution. In the two dimensional case, it appears that the spectrum has its support on a Cantor set. As we know that finite approximations are explicitly close to the limiting measure, we could in principle use computer assisted methods to prove rigorously that there are gaps. Very prominent is the gap [4,6] in the dimension 2 (graphs with some triangles K3 but no tetrahedral subgraphs K4). Here are the pictures from the paper:
Here is some graphics added in an upgraded version of the paper: